I have watched a film recently which has changed how I would react if either myself, or anyone who is emotionally close to me is ever diagnosed with cancer.  As 1:4 people develop cancer at some point in their life, and many people that I had the pleasure to know have passed already, I hope to be able to share this information with anyone who is not determined that only conventional means of medicine, can or should be tried as a  treatment or cure.

The film is A WORLD WITHOUT CANCER narrated by G.Edward Griffin in 1974. Please note though that Griffin is a film maker and it is Ernst T Krebs who advocates the use of Laetrile as a cancer therapy.

About Ernest T Krebs  http://www.karlloren.com/biopsy/p76.htm

In the book & film G.Edward Griffin exposes the politics involved in cancer treatment and it remains as controversial today as it was when it was first written.

This treatment is NOT FDA approved, which is no surprise as they are in such cohoots with the government & Monsanto to name just one company who’s conduct is a disgrace.This is a company who wants all our lettuce and spinach to be irradiated !! It is actually ILLEGAL to use this treatment in America and the FDA have had people arrested for holding meetings on this controversial way of treating cancer patients. So what is this radical treatment that worries the FDA so much ………. VITAMIN B17 or Leatrile, also known as Amygdaline.

Yes, it is just a vitamin but hey, if you look into the logic, and the history of medicine and the way that the health system operates you may think of cancer treatment as a total farce and believe that nutrition is the answer to our world wide cancer problem.

In this film he  portrays cancer as being a deficiency disease unlike conventional medicine explaining cancer to be a chronic metabolic disease. He uses a prime example of how cancer is a defficiency disease by reminding us of scurvy. It took 200 years for it to be commonly noted that scurvy was a Vitamin C defficiency. How many people died unnessesarily due to the medical professions disbelief or unrecognition that a lack of Vitamin C could cause the body so much harm.

Griffin was first given an insight to the use of vitamin treatment for cancer whilst on a fishing trip with physician John Richardson. Richardson had told Griffin how he had seen great results when treating cancer patients with Laetrile,  but  he faced oppostion from local medical authorities because his treatment was not FDA approved.

The FDA even went to great lengths to show Laetril in the worst possible light by running a campaign involving the putting up of 10,000 posters in post offices and issuing bulletins to the medical community. So no wonder that today the mainstream consider Laetril to be toxic.

1953 California report

In 1953 a report written by Dr Henry Garland and Dr E. M. McDonald of the California Medical Assiciations Cancer Advisory Commission, claims that no proof exists that Laetril is an effective treatment for cancer. These same two doctors also clamed that there was no link between smoking and lung cancer!

I read earlier that Dr E. M. McDonald died in his bed when a fire was started by a cigatette. ( I have no idea if this is true, but if it is, it’s quite ironic.)

Laetrile versus conventional treatment.

Laetrile will only act on malignant cells, leaving any tumor intact but radiation therapy can blast the cancer into other parts of the body greatly increasin the risk of secondary cancer growth.

Cancer free societies

In the film it is mentioned that the Hunzakuts, peoples native of Hunza ( an area north of Pakistan ) often live to the ages of 100 even 120.

In Hunza society there is no cancer. Not one case of cancer exists within these people who are living in their native environment. The major factor for this seems to be that they consume so much nitrilocides including Vitamin B17 in their diet. One of the foodstuffs with the highest content of Vitamin B17 is the apricot seed. In Hunza a mans wealth is measured by the amount of apricot trees he owns.

http://longevity.about.com/od/longevitylegends/p/hunza.htm

What foods contain Laetrile

There is a good table on the link below showing foods that are high in Vitamin B17 and also atthe bottom is good guidelines as to how much of these foods is sensible to eat.

http://www.laetrile.com.au/copy.asp?sect=q2&page=foods

The above table was from a site by Angelo Rodriguez & if you click on the above link there can be found his and other peoples testimonials of their cancer treatments using Vitamin B17.

You will see, if you have read this and want  like me,to look into the controversy around this issue a little deeper find that Laetril contains cyanide. The film, A world without cancer does explain how this is not scary at all, but  that the cyanide is an important part of the Vitamins structure. Here is how Angelo explains things  …………………..

Hydrogen Cyanide must be FORMED!! There is no free Hydrogen Cyanide in laetrile floating around freely in our body waiting to harm us when we eat apricot seeds or take laetrile. The enzyme Beta-Glucosidase, and only that enzyme is capable of manufacturing and forming the Hydrogen Cyanide from Laetrile. If there are no cancer cells in the body, there is no beta-glucosidase. If there is no beta-glucosidase, no hydrogen cyanide will be formed from laetrile. Even if there were some other way to manufacture cyanide from laetrile in the body, the amount would be so minute it would have little, if any toxic effect. (see How does B17 kill Cancer?)

Laetrile does on the other hand contain the cyanide radical (CN-). So does Vitamin B12 , Cassava and strawberries and a host of other foods we consume. You never heard of anyone getting cyanide poison from vitamin B12 or from eating strawberries because it just does not happen. Lets also look at table salt which is made up of sodium Chloride (NaCl) and is very common in most households. Yet, did you know pure sodium (Na+) is one of the most toxic substances known to man? Yet in their form locked together they are not toxic. Any good toxicologist will tell you sugar is 20 times more toxic than laetrile and salt is also much more toxic.

All I can suggest is that you do more research yourself and keep an open mind.